DataSolmu blog

What Early ESRS Reports Can and Cannot Teach

A review of how early ESRS reporting practice can help companies learn without becoming a copy-paste template.

ESRS EFRAG Observed practice Implementation Reporting
Illustration of a review table comparing early sustainability reports.

Early ESRS reports are valuable because they show how companies organize unfamiliar disclosure requirements under real deadlines. They reveal practical pressure points: ownership, materiality explanations, value-chain boundaries, data gaps, assurance preparation, and the relationship between narrative and metrics.

They are less useful when treated as templates. A disclosure that makes sense for one company may be misleading for another because the facts, sector, governance structure, and materiality assessment are different.

What Companies Can Learn

Early reporting practice can help teams ask better questions:

These questions help a company design its own reporting process.

What Companies Should Not Copy

The most obvious risk is copying tone or wording. The deeper risk is copying judgement. If another company discloses a topic in a particular way, that does not prove the same treatment is right for a different company.

A report reflects its own context: sector, geography, business model, value chain, materiality process, data maturity, assurance approach, and management judgement. Those conditions are not transferable by default.

From Examples To Better Questions

The best use of early ESRS practice is to convert examples into questions:

This turns observed practice into learning rather than imitation.

Practical Takeaway

Early ESRS reports should be read like field notes from implementation. They help companies see where reporting becomes difficult, but they do not replace company-specific analysis. The useful lesson is not "say it like they said it." The useful lesson is "understand what evidence and judgement made that disclosure possible."